A commonly occurring benign bone forming tumour can occur in
any age group with increased male preponderance. It was first described in 1930
and later identified as a separate disease in mid of 1930s. osteoid osteoma can
involve any bone but is more commonly found in long bones and that too in
tibia, femur and humurus. Involvement of spine, hand and feet is also
documented.
Almost two third of all cases of osteoid osteoma occur in
the long bones involving shaft, epiphyses of diaphysial region. When spine is
the site, involvement is mor.e commonly seen in posterior components like
spinous processes, lamina or pedicles. Facet joint involvement can also occur.
Patient presents with onset of pain in the region of
affected bone. Pain is sharp and agonizing and starts more often at night. It
is relieved by taking medications like disprin. Pain usually does not occur in
the morning of day time. Sometimes patient may present with swelling at the
site of lesion.
On examination, there may be element of tenderness at the
site of tumor. There may be obvious swelling. Sometimes, although not common,
there may be warmth and redness suggesting inflammatory process.
Laboratory findings are usually normal and the diagnosis is
often delayed for quite some time. There have been evidences that a 3 year
delay was documented from the onset of symptoms. This delay is contributed by
many factors including equivocal imaging findings, complete pain relief by
salicylates and sometimes complete resolution with time.
DIAGNOSING OSTEOID OSTEOMA:
X-RAY:
Imaging has evolved greatly and routine use of radiography
is still considered to the first modality of choice in the diagnosis of osteoid
osteoma. On x-ray, there is a lucent line in the region of tumor with
surrounding rim of increased bone density or sclerosis. There is thickening of
cortex. The central lucent area is called nidus and consists of highly vascular
soft tissue component of the tumor. Sometimes the lesion is in the
subperiosteal region and lucent line may not be appreciated. It is quite
possible that only sclerotic rim is visible and no lucent nidus appreciated. If
the lesion is intra-articular, then it may be possible to only appreciate
minimal sclerosis around the central lucency.
Tumor usually does not extend beyond 2 cm size. If spine is
involved, there are much more chances of scoliosis with concave side towards
the tumor. Any young who complains of neck or back pain should be suspected of
having this tumor and be investigated accordingly. Most common age of this
tumor is about twenty five years.
CT SCAN IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF OSTEOID OSTEOMA:
Computational tomography is now considered best modality of
choice for those lesions which are not picked on routine x-ray examination. CT
helps to better localize and define the lesion. A nidus can be found easily in
this modality. It also confirms the presence of surrounding sclerosis and
thickening of cortex. This modality is considered best for detecting
intra-articular lesions specially hip joints. With the advent of multiplaner
reconstruction, it is easier to localize the tumor.
BONE SCANNING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF OSTEOID OSTEOMA:
This modality has a hundred percent sensitivity in the
diagnosis of osteoid osteoma. It can detect lesions which were missed on x-ray.
It can also differentiate it from other lesions like spondylolysis by
performing immediate and delayed scanning. In case of osteoma, there is tracer
uptake immediately after injection, a feature which is not seen in case of
spondylolysis.
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF OSTEOID
OSTEOMA:
MRI is not considered better option because it can miss the
lesion and also there is sometimes confusion in interpretation of lesion.
Features may suggest malignancy when it is not there. Nevertheless, MRI will
show hypointense signals in the lesion on T1W imaging with post-contrast
enhancement which may be uniform of ring like.
CLICK HERE FOR MANAGEMENT OF OSTEOID OSTEOMA:
CLICK HERE FOR MANAGEMENT OF OSTEOID OSTEOMA:
No comments:
Post a Comment